Legal Opinion

Nelson v. Board of Com'rs

Utah Supreme Court

Decided September 14, 1923No. 4028PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGideon, J.

This is an original proceeding in this court asking for a writ of prohibition against the defendants.

Defendants Winegar, Holt, and Stevenson are county commissioners of Davis county, and are charged with the duty of levying a tax against the property within the boundaries *219of the defendant Bonneville irrigation district. The defendants Howard, Nelson, and Parkin are the directors of the Bonneville irrigation district, and as snch are charged with the duty of preparing a budget each year for the district, and certifying the same to the county commissioners, upon which the commissioners levy the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Interstate Trust Co. v. Montezuma Valley Irrigation DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1919
  2. State ex rel. Clancy v. Columbia Irrigation DistrictWashington Supreme Court · 1922
  3. State ex rel. Lundberg v. Green River Irrigation DistrictUtah Supreme Court · 1911

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Malott v. Board of County CommissionersMontana Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Klemm v. DavenportSupreme Court of Florida · 1930
  3. Cosman v. Chestnut Valley Irrigation DistrictMontana Supreme Court · 1925
  4. American Falls Reservoir District v. ThrallIdaho Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Municipal Investors Assn. v. BirminghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1942

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API