Legal Opinion
Klemm v. Davenport
Supreme Court of Florida
Decided August 5, 1930PublishedCited by 60 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtTerrell, C. J.
— The City of Clermont paved certain of its streets and assessed the entire cost against the abutting property, said cost being spread over ten equal annual installments. To provide immediate funds to meet the expense of this paving, the city issued its bonds as authorized by Chapter 9298, Laws of Florida, Acts of 1923 (Section 3022 et seq., Comp. Gen. Laws of 1927). Said bonds purport on their face to be general obligations of the city, were validated by decree of the Circuit Court of Lake county and bear certificate of that fact. Plaintiff in error is the owner of five thousand dollars of…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Lainhart v. CattsSupreme Court of Florida · 1917
- Anderson v. RitterbuschSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- County of Redwood v. Winona & St. Peter Land Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
- County Commissioners v. KingSupreme Court of Florida · 1869
- Colby v. City of MedfordOregon Supreme Court · 1917
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by60 opinions
- City of Boca Raton v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1992
- American Co. v. City of LakeportCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
- State v. Miami Beach Redevelopment AgencySupreme Court of Florida · 1980
- May v. Board of DirectorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- City of Gainesville v. STATE, DOTDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.