Legal Opinion

Burns v. Cote

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided February 7, 1933PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarble, J.

The plaintiff’s evidence tended to prove the following facts. The highway on which the plaintiff received his injury was constructed of cement. The plaintiff was walking at the extreme left-hand edge of the cement in order to avoid cars coming from the west. It was impossible for him to walk on the shoulders of the highway, since snow was piled high on each side of the road.

Paige, driving a seven-passenger Nash touring car and carrying a passenger, saw the plaintiff about five hundred feet away. The highway was covered with a thick coating of ice, and Paige was driving over this ice at a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Linden v. MillerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Lambert v. Eastern Massachusetts Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
  3. Osborne v. CharbneauWashington Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Deantonio v. New Haven Dairy Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1927
  5. Sullivan v. LutzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1923

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Marshall v. NugentCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1955
  2. Smith v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1935
  3. Richard J. Lakin and Brenda Lakin v. Daniel Marr & Son Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1984
  4. Komer v. ShipleyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1946
  5. Dane v. MacGregorSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1947

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API