Jack Bryan, Inc. v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
Rao, Judge:
The merchandise involved in this case was imported from Hong Kong and consists of items, such as collars, cuffs, belts, and parts for blouses or dresses, made up of nets of wool or man-made fiber on which have been sewn beads, bugles, spangles, or imitation gemstones or combinations thereof. It was classified as women’s wearing apparel, ornamented, and was assessed with duty under item 382.02 or item 382.04, Tariff Schedules of the United States, depending upon whether it was in chief value of wool or man-made fibers. (Style No. 8078 in entry No. 120179 was classified under item…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Arnold v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- United States v. Snow's United States Sample Express Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915
- United States v. Cartier (Inc.)Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927
- Krusi v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
- Authentic Furniture Products, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1973
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Cardinal Glove Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1982
- Dynamics Classics, Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1986