Legal Opinion

Fallon McElligott, Inc. v. Seaboard Surety Co.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided April 4, 2000No. C5-99-1562PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DAVIES, Judge.

Respondent Fallon McElligott, Inc. (Fal-lon), an advertising agency, prepared for a client advertisements that copyright holders believed violated their copyrights. The client, upon demand by the copyright holders, withdrew the advertisements and brought a claim against Fallon for breach of contract and professional negligence (but not for copyright infringement). Fal-lon settled the client’s claim and sought to recover settlement and defense costs from appellant Seaboard Surety Company (Seaboard), its enumerated-perils insurer, and from its insurance agent, respondent…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hubred v. Control Data Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  2. Meadowbrook, Inc. v. Tower Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
  3. Meister v. Western National Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
  4. Franklin v. Western National Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
  5. Ross v. Briggs and MorganSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Maryland Casualty Co. v. Blackstone International Ltd.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2015
  2. Progressive Specialty Insurance Co. v. Widness Ex Rel. WidnessCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
  3. Northwestern National Insurance Co. v. CarlsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006
  4. Derma Pen v. Sentinel Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2021
  5. Maryland Casualty Co. v. Blackstone International Ltd.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API