Legal Opinion

Franklin v. Western National Mutual Insurance Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 8, 1998No. C6-96-1684, C6-96-1748PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GARDEBRING, Justice.

This ease calls upon us to determine whether a counterclaim for trespass arising from a lease dispute triggers an insurer’s duty to defend an insured under a Comprehensive General Liability policy and a broad form endorsement. Because we conclude that the counterclaim, although alleging trespass, was plainly grounded in a contract dispute, we hold that Western National owed no duty to defend Franklin against the counterclaim.

Respondent Franklin Outdoor Advertising Company (“Franklin”) constructs and maintains outdoor advertising structures, many of which are located…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. SCSC Corp. v. Allied Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
  2. Prahm v. Rupp Construction Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  3. Brown v. State Automobile & Casualty UnderwritersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  4. Meister v. Western National Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
  5. Bituminous Casualty Corp. v. BartlettSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Thommes v. Milwaukee Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
  2. American Family Insurance Co. v. WalserSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
  3. Reinsurance Ass'n of Minnesota v. TimmerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002
  4. Wakefield Pork, Inc. v. Ram Mutual Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2007
  5. Francis v. PiperCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API