Legal Opinion

Felix v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 14, 1958No. Appeal, No. 281PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Wright, J.,

On August 20, 1957, David H. H. Felix filed with the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission a complaint against the Bell Telephone Company of Pennsylvania requesting that the rates charged by the Company for listings in its classified directory be declared a matter within the jurisdiction of, and subject to regulation by, the Commission. On April 7, 1958, after hearing, the Commission dismissed the complaint for lack of jurisdiction. Felix has appealed.

Appellant, a lawyer engaged in active practice in the City of Philadelphia, is a subscriber to the Com*580pany’s telephone…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. West Penn Railways Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  2. Borough of Ambridge, Appel. v. P.S.C.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  3. Erie Lighting Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Bash v. Bell Telephone Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  2. Behrend v. Bell Telephone Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  3. ABC Sewer Cleaning Co. v. Bell of PennsylvaniaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  4. City of Philadelphia v. Philadelphia Electric Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  5. The Classified Directory Subscribers Association v. Public Service Commission of the District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API