Ismael v. Goodman Toyota

WELLS, Judge.

On appeal, plaintiff contends, inter alia, that the trial court erred in making the following conclusions of law:

Conclusions of Law

2. Due to the purchase of the subject vehicle in used ‘as is’ condition, the Defendant dealer assumed and bore no responsibility for subsequent repair of the vehicle or its road worthiness.

3. Defendant also bore no responsibility for repairing the vehicle, notwithstanding any alleged verbal promises and agreements made subsequent to the purchase of the vehicle in ‘as is’ condition.

4. Defendant is not liable to Plaintiff for negligence or breach of…