Legal Opinion
Szubski v. Mercedes-Benz, U.S.A., L.L.C.
Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court
Decided April 8, 2003No. CV-02-483588PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BuRT W. Griffin, Judge.
{¶ 1} This is an action for consumer relief arising from the lease of an automobile. Plaintiffs Ralph Szubski and Computer Jungle, Inc. seek damages under the Magnuson-Moss Warranty-Act, Section 2301 et seq., Title 15, U.S.Code (Counts I and II), and the Ohio Lemon Law, R.C. 1345.71 et seq. (Count III).
{¶ 2} This matter is before the court on the motion of defendant Mercedes-Benz, U.S.A., L.L.C. to dismiss Counts I and II of the first amended complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, and plaintiffs Ralph Szubski and Computer Jungle, Inc.’s…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Corral v. Rollins Protective Services Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1987
- DiCintio v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 2002
- Freeman v. Hubco Leasing, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1985
- Royce v. SmithOhio Supreme Court · 1981
- Sellers v. Frank Griffin AMC Jeep, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Mesa v. BMW OF NORTH AMERICA, LLCDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
- Voelker v. Porsche Cars North America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
- Parrot v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.Arizona Supreme Court · 2006
- Mangold v. Nissan North America, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2004
- Voelker v. Porsche Cars North America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.