Legal Opinion

Reid v. Eckerds Drugs, Inc.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided April 3, 1979No. 7814SC483PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN (Robert M.), Judge.

Plaintiff brought this civil action to recover damages arising on personal injuries sustained, allegedly resulting from the use of an aerosol deodorant sold to plaintiff’s wife by defendant. Plaintiff’s evidence tended to show that on 23 September 1976, he was preparing to go to work and liberally applied deodorant from an aerosol can of 5-day antiperspirant to his underarms and neck. He then put the can of deodorant down, walked across the room to where his shirt was, took up a cigarette and proceeded to light it with a match from a paper book of matches. When he…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Helene Curtis Industries, Inc. And Cosmair, Inc. v. Edd Pruitt and Marjorie Ann PruittCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
  2. Center Chemical Co. v. ParziniSupreme Court of Georgia · 1975
  3. Gottsdanker v. Cutter LaboratoriesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  4. Hamon v. DiglianiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1961
  5. Brown v. Globe Laboratories, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1957

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Bryant v. AdamsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
  2. Goodman v. Wenco Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
  3. Colony Hill Condominium I Ass'n v. Colony Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  4. Nancy L. Bly, Administratrix of Wayne A. Bly, Deceased v. Otis Elevator Company, a New Jersey CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1983
  5. Maybank v. S. S. Kresge Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1981

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API