Legal Opinion

Lewis v. Whitney

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 1, 1927No. Docket No. 127PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFellows, J.

Plaintiffs’ declaration counts in tort for fraud and deceit. Upon a trial with a jury they recovered something less than their claim. Upon a motion for a new trial the amount of their recovery was further reduced. Defendant, however, sued out this writ of error and in his brief thus summarizes his contentions:

“The following questions are raised by the assignments of error, and they will be discussed in the order here given:
“(1) Did the court unreasonably restrict the right of defendant to show the respective value and condition of the Utica, Wayne and Tessman properties?
“(2) Was the refusal…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Canfield v. City of JacksonMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Roy v. KirnMichigan Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Romanuick v. Highland Park State BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Johnson v. DoonMichigan Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Vhay v. GiesMichigan Supreme Court · 1926

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Jones v. Eastern Michigan MotorbusesMichigan Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Olchefsky v. Mercier, Bryant, Larkins Brick Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Taylor v. WardMichigan Supreme Court · 1933
  4. In Re Yokom's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Veley v. BurtMichigan Supreme Court · 1928

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API