Johnson v. Doon
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Hillsdale; Chester, J. Assumpsit by Addison E. Johnson and others against James W. Doon and Frederick J. Doon, copartners as J. W. Doon & Co., for goods sold and delivered. From a judgment for plaintiffs, defendants bring error.
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.
The plaintiffs recovered a judgment against defendants for $335.30. The defendants have brought the case here by writ of error. It is claimed the court should have directed a verdict in favor of defendants.
The plaintiffs are farmers residing in this State. Defendants reside in Worcester, Mass., and are dealers in hay. Mr. William Pratt lived near Hudson, Mich., and made an arrangement with defendants by which he was to buy *453hay for them. It is claimed by plaintiffs that, while he was the agent of defendants, they sold him the hay for which this suit was brought. It is claimed by defendants…
2Cited by2 opinions
- Lewis v. WhitneyMichigan Supreme Court · 1927
- In re Turner's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1922