Legal Opinion

AMCO Insurance Co. v. Lang

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 25, 1988No. C4-87-1790PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COYNE, Justice.

The question presented by this action for a judgment declaratory of rights and liabilities with respect to the underinsured motorist coverage afforded by a plan of reparation security is before this court upon certification by the United States District Court, District of Minnesota, pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 480.061 (1986):

May an insurer enforce the language of its insurance policy, which precludes the stacking of underinsured motorist coverages and requires the reduction from underinsured motorist limits of amount paid by a negligent tortfeasor, when the insurance policy was…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Interinsurance Exchange of the Automobile Club v. Ohio Casualty InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Holman v. All Nation Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  3. Van Tassel v. Horace Mann Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
  4. Wasche v. Milbank Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  5. Despatch Oven Co. v. RauenhorstSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Jepson v. General Casualty Co. of WisconsinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
  2. Bursch v. Beardsley & PiperCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
  3. Roering v. Grinnell Mutual Reinsurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  4. Wondra v. American Family Insurance GroupCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
  5. Casey v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API