Wondra v. American Family Insurance Group
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PARKER, Judge.
Joseph Wondra appeals from a declaratory judgment in which the trial court interpreted provisions of the Minnesota Insurance Guaranty Association Act (Minn.Stat. §§ 60C.01-.20 (1982)) and found that Won-dra must first pursue and exhaust his own uninsured motorist coverage before pursuing claims against the Minnesota Insurance Guaranty Association (MIGA), that any uninsured benefits must be offset against MIGA’s obligation, and that Wondra cannot pursue underinsurance claims. Won-*457dra also appeals from the trial court s denial of an award of attorney’s fees. We reverse, and…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Frost-Benco Electric Ass'n v. Minnesota Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Schmidt v. ClothierSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Atwater Creamery Co. v. Western National Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- Holman v. All Nation Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Canadian Universal Insurance Co. v. Fire Watch, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Garrick v. Northland Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
- Gimmestad v. GimmestadCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990
- In Re Silicone Implant Insurance Coverage LitigationCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002
- Casey v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
- Hawkins v. Kentucky Insurance Guaranty Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1992
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.