Legal Opinion
Bursch v. Beardsley & Piper
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided July 24, 1992No. Nos. 91-2891, 91-3028PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BEAM, Circuit Judge.
Beardsley & Piper appeals an adverse judgment arising from a diversity action filed by Richard Bursch, an injured foundry worker, and his wife, Loretta. Beardsley & Piper asserts that the district court erred in denying its request for a superseding cause instruction and in refusing to reallocate part of an uncollectible share of the verdict to Bursch. The Bursches cross-appeal, arguing that the district court erred in denying them prejudgment interest during the period Beardsley & Piper’s parent company, Pettibone Corporation (Petti-bone), was in bankruptcy. We affirm.
1.…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Salve Regina College v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Lambertson v. Cincinnati Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Bilotta v. Kelley Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- 18 Collier bankr.cas.2d 717, Bankr. L. Rep. P 72,183 in Re Titan Energy, Inc. National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, Pa. v. Titan Energy, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1988
- Lienhard v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Ralph L. Gray, Appellant/cross-Appellee v. O. Gene Bicknell, Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
- Robert Hawxhurst v. Pettibone CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- In Re Samuel Duke Cardelucci, Debtor. Willem Onink, Marsha Onink v. Samuel Duke CardelucciCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Ben Sterkel v. Fruehauf Corporation Ace Hardware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
- Hoselton v. Metz Baking Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.