Legal Opinion
Santiago v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided March 15, 2007No. 05-800CPublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
LETTOW, Judge.
This military disability case comes before the court for a second time following a decision on remand rendered by the Army’s Physical Evaluation Board (“PEB”), addressing questions raised by the court in a prior decision, Santiago v. United States, 71 Fed.Cl. 220 (2006). Plaintiff Gloria A. Santiago, a Sergeant retired from the United States Army Reserve, renews her challenge to her disability rating as determined and redetermined by the Army’s disability evaluation process. Ms. Santiago was placed on the *650Army’s Temporary Disability Retired List (“TDRL”) on…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Fisher v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Bannum, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- David W. Heisig v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Daniel A. Lindsay v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- Nippon Steel Corporation, Nkk Corporation, Kawasaki Steel Corporation, and Toyo Kohan Co., Ltd. v. United States, and Mittal Steel USA Isg Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Vanguard Recovery Assistance v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- Furniture By Thurston v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- Holloway & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
- Alabama Aircraft Industries, Inc.-Birmingham v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
- Knowledge Connections, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.