Furniture By Thurston v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER1
LETTOW, Judge.
This is a post-award bid protest of a task-order contract for furnishing a barracks being built in Okinawa, Japan, for the U.S. Marine Corps (“Marine Corps” or “agency”). Among the items sought to be procured by the solicitation were 364 bed-units, comprised in part of “[mjetal pop-up beds with pneumatic rams or shock absorber[s].” The contract was awarded to DCI, Inc. (“DCI”), which in due course has delivered the furniture to a government warehouse in Okinawa, where the furniture remains pending issuance of instructions from the Marine Corps to DCI for…
2Cases cited74 opinions
- Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Church of Scientology of California v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Land v. DollarSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- North Carolina v. RiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- DeFunis v. OdegaardSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- Bcpeabody Construction Services, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- Hyperion, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
- Caddell Construction Co., Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- Eco Tour Adventures, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- Science Applications International Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.