Legal Opinion

Furniture By Thurston v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided February 21, 2012No. 11-663PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER1

LETTOW, Judge.

This is a post-award bid protest of a task-order contract for furnishing a barracks being built in Okinawa, Japan, for the U.S. Marine Corps (“Marine Corps” or “agency”). Among the items sought to be procured by the solicitation were 364 bed-units, comprised in part of “[mjetal pop-up beds with pneumatic rams or shock absorber[s].” The contract was awarded to DCI, Inc. (“DCI”), which in due course has delivered the furniture to a government warehouse in Okinawa, where the furniture remains pending issuance of instructions from the Marine Corps to DCI for…

2Cases cited74 opinions

  1. Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
  2. Church of Scientology of California v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Land v. DollarSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  4. North Carolina v. RiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. DeFunis v. OdegaardSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Bcpeabody Construction Services, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
  2. Hyperion, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
  3. Caddell Construction Co., Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
  4. Eco Tour Adventures, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
  5. Science Applications International Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API