Legal Opinion

Holloway & Co. v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided May 14, 2009No. 09-53CPublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER1

LETTOW, Judge.

This is a post-award bid protest regarding a procurement of auditing services for the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (“CMS”). The procurement involved a competition among holders of Federal Supply Schedule contracts issued by the General Services Administration, and was conducted in accord with Federal Acquisition Regulation (“FAR”) Subpart 8.4, 48 C.F.R. Subpart 8.4. The protest comes before the court after two rounds of proceedings at the Government Accountability Office (“GAO”), the first of which resulted in corrective action by CMS.

The case in…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Califano v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Bannum, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Ashbritt, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
  2. Bcpeabody Construction Services, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
  3. Allied Technology Group, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
  4. L-3 Communications EOTech, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
  5. Furniture By Thurston v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API