Legal Opinion

People v. Langlois

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 2, 1963No. Crim. 8717PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFiles, J.

Defendant appeals from a judgment wherein he was convicted of pimping and pandering in violation of sections 266h and 266i of the Penal Code. Count I of the information charged that defendant, knowing Rose Mary Heulett to be a prostitute, derived support and maintenance from the earnings of her prostitution. In count II defendant was charged with having induced her by threats and violence to become an inmate of a house of prostitution. The information further alleged defendant’s convictions of three prior felonies.

When the case came on for trial, defendant admitted the priors, waived a jury,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. People v. . ShilitanoNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
  2. People v. PerezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  3. United States v. TrocheCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1954
  4. People v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  5. People v. LeeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Pueblo v. Chévere HerediaSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1995
  2. People v. DelgadoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  3. In Re WeberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  4. People v. SawyerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  5. People v. BreslinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API