Legal Opinion

In Re Weber

California Supreme Court

Decided June 20, 1974No. Crim. 16157PublishedCited by 59 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

McCOMB, J.

Petitioner, an attorney, who is serving a sentence for conviction of the crime of soliciting another to offer a bribe, in violation of section 653f of the Penal Code, petitioned this court for a writ of habeas corpus. He claimed that he had newly discovered evidence to the effect that Thomas Devins (also known as Thomas Utter), the person whom he allegedly solicited to offer a bribe, had “framed” him; that such evidence, if credited, would undermine the entire case of the prosecution and point unerringly to his innocence; and that, accordingly, habeas corpus was an…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Kastigar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. People v. TenorioCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  3. In Re LindleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  4. People v. SidenerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Esteybar v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by59 opinions

  1. In Re ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  2. People v. GonzalezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  3. People v. HillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  4. People v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
  5. In Re HallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API