People v. Delgado
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ARABIAN, J.
We determine whether the trial court erred in denying defendant Steven Delgado’s motion for a new trial based on a witness’s posttrial declaration, and whether the trial court engaged in a prejudicial ex parte communication with the jury. The Court of Appeal found error on both of these bases, and reversed defendant’s conviction for second degree murder and misdemeanor child abuse. We disagree and reverse the Court of Appeal.
I. Facts
A. Prosecution Case
1. Background
On September 26, 1989, at 7:40 a.m., Elizabeth Ruiz (Ruiz) called “911” to report that she had awakened to find…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- People v. MickeyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- People v. PrideCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- People v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- People v. JenningsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- People v. WrightCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by87 opinions
- People v. HoltCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
- People v. CoffmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
- People v. RogersCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
- People v. TurnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- People v. RielCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
82 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.