Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Lepeska v. Farley

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided October 5, 1992No. 30153-5-IPublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Per curiam

Frederick Farley seeks discretionary review of the January 30, 1992, order entered in King County Superior Court determining that service of process was sufficient. We grant discretionary review, accelerate review pursuant to RAP 18.12, and reverse the trial court.

Facts

On June 1, 1988, Alex Lepeska was in a motorcycle accident. On May 29, 1991, only 2 days before expiration of the statute of limitations, Lepeska filed a complaint in King County Superior Court against Frederick Farley and Jane Doe Farley seeking damages as a result of Farley's alleged negligence in causing the accident.

On July…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Wichert v. CardwellWashington Supreme Court · 1991
  2. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance v. GooleyWashington Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Brenner v. Port of BellinghamCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1989
  4. Painter v. OlneyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1984
  5. Mid-City Materials, Inc. v. Heater Beaters Custom FireplacesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1984

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Sheldon v. FettigWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Sheldon v. FettigWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Jones v. StebbinsWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Scanlan v. TownsendWashington Supreme Court · 2014
  5. Farmer v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API