Legal Opinion

John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance v. Gooley

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 3, 1938No. 26996. En BancPublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeals, J.

— During the year 1922, Edward and Pauline Gooley executed a note to Farm Mortgage Security Company, for the sum of twenty thousand dollars, secured by a mortgage on their farm in Lincoln county. The note and mortgage were thereafter assigned to the plaintiff in this action, John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Company. The note fell due November 1, 1927, and August 22, 1927, payment thereof was extended to November 1, 1932.

August 5, 1922, Mr. and Mrs. Gooley executed an agreement, by the terms of which Mr. Gooley should become the owner of the land, in case of the death of his wife.

Mr. and…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Powell v. NolanWashington Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Murray v. O'BrienWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Dane v. DanielWashington Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Chehalis Coal Co. v. LaisureWashington Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Bennett v. Supreme Tent of the Knights of the Maccabees of the WorldWashington Supreme Court · 1905

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Wichert v. CardwellWashington Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Ellern v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1945
  3. In Re Marriage of LeslieWashington Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Williams v. Steamship Mutual Underwriting Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Northern Commercial Co. v. E. J. Hermann Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1979

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API