Legal Opinion

Farmer v. Davis

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided April 21, 2011No. 28817-0-IIIPublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSiddoway, J.

¶1 — Washington statutes permit service of a summons by delivery to someone other than the defendant (substitute service) if a copy is left at the house of the defendant’s usual abode with a resident of suitable age and discretion. RCW 4.28.080(15). In this case, the only delivery of a summons for Bradley Davis that was timely accomplished was delivery to Mr. Davis’s mother’s home, where Mr. Davis had resided three years earlier, at the time of the auto accident giving rise to the action. The trial court granted summary judgment dismissing Mr. Farmer’s complaint on grounds that undisputed…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Hisle v. Todd Pacific Shipyards Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Hisle v. Todd Pacific Shipyards Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Schaaf v. HighfieldWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Wichert v. CardwellWashington Supreme Court · 1991

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Scanlan v. TownsendWashington Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Fitzgerald v. Mountain-West Resources, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2012
  3. Peggi Northwick v. Andrew LongCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
  4. Scanlan v. TownsendCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
  5. State v. AlltusCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API