Legal Opinion

Brenner v. Port of Bellingham

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided January 9, 1989No. 21244-3-IPublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWinsor, J.

Plaintiff's claim is for damages for inverse condemnation. Irwin Brenner, personal representative of the estate of Celia Brenner, appeals from an order granting summary judgment of dismissal in favor of the Port of Bellingham (the Port).

Brenner contends that the summons by publication obtained by the Port in 1968 was defective, that the Port therefore failed to obtain jurisdiction over Brenner, that the judgment of condemnation therefore was void, and the trial court accordingly erred in failing to grant summary judgment to Brenner and in granting the Port summary judgment of dismissal.

The…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Graves v. P. J. Taggares Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Martin v. MeierWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  3. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance v. GooleyWashington Supreme Court · 1938
  4. In Re the Marriage of MarkowskiCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1988
  5. Painter v. OlneyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1984

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Martin v. TriolWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Allstate Insurance v. KhaniCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1994
  3. In Re Marriage of LeslieWashington Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Leen v. DemopolisCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1991
  5. Dobbins v. MendozaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1997

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API