Legal Opinion
Trainor v. Berner
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided September 27, 1971No. 66 Civ. 2177PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LASKER, District Judge.
This is an application under Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for approval of the settlement of a stockholder’s derivative suit. By court order, and on notice mailed to all stockholders setting forth the terms of settlement, a hearing was held April 10, 1970, at which counsel for the parties and for one objectant were heard.
The suit alleges violations of § 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Act”) and, as pendent matters, violation of state law. The plaintiff is a stockholder of Curtiss-Wright Corporation (“Curtiss”), in whose behalf the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Electronic Specialty Co. v. International Controls Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
- Saxe v. BradyCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1962
- Glicken v. BradfordDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1964
- Saxe v. BradyCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1962
- Lewis v. Hat Corp. of AmericaCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1959
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Stull v. BakerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1976
- Rosenberg v. Jack Foley Realty, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 1979
- In re Baldwin-United Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1984
- Republic National Life Insurance v. BeasleyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1977
- Buchanan v. Century Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.