Legal Opinion

Patterson v. Donahue

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 8, 1971No. 42640PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Kelly, Justice.

Defendants appeal from a judgment in plaintiff’s favor and the denial of their motion for a new trial. Reversal is sought on the grounds that plaintiff’s attorney argued to the jury the effect of a special verdict, the trial court refused an instruction to the jury specifically removing from them the right to consider future earning capacity, and the damages were given under influence of passion and prejudice and are excessive. We affirm.

On November 15, 1967, plaintiff, Michael R. Patterson, was driving his car on a service road after leaving his employer’s plant. He stopped…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Schwartz v. Minneapolis Suburban Bus Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
  2. Mattfeld v. NesterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
  3. Johnson v. O'BRIENSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
  4. DeGroot v. Van AkkerenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Jangula v. KlocekSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Togstad v. Vesely, Otto, Miller & KeefeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  2. Arney v. HelbigCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  3. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. ShortCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990
  4. Frank v. FrankCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
  5. Troupe v. Sunrise Electric, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API