Legal Opinion

Jangula v. Klocek

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided September 12, 1969No. 41353PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Nelson, Justice.

This is an appeal by defendants from a judgment of the Hennepin County District Court. Plaintiffs, through filing notice of review pursuant to Rule 106, Rules of Civil Appellate Procedure, seek review of the judgment and of an order denying defendants’ motion for a new trial conditional on remittitur.

The issues presented for review are unique. The action arose out of an automobile accident occurring December 25, 1963, at Minneapolis, Minnesota. Plaintiffs, Angeline Jangula and Benard Jangula, wife and husband, sought to recover damages allegedly sustained by them as a result…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Plesko v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Hallada v. Great Northern RailwaySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
  3. Templeton Feed & Grain v. Ralston Purina Co.California Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Thill v. Modern Erecting CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
  5. Burmek v. Miller Brewing Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1961

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Busch v. Busch Construction, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  2. McGuire v. C & L RESTAURANT INC.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  3. Miller v. National American Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  4. Terry v. Zions Cooperative Mercantile InstitutionUtah Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Miller v. Chicago Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1975

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API