Legal Opinion

Frank v. Frank

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided July 21, 1987No. CX-86-2044PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LANSING, Judge.

Donald and Maxine Frank appeal the trial court’s denial of their motions for judgment notwithstanding the verdict (JNOV) or a new trial in their personal injury action. The jury, by special verdict, found both Donald Frank and Kent Frank negligent, but that neither party’s negligence was the cause of Donald Frank’s damages. Donald and Maxine Frank appeal the denial of their motion for JNOV or new trial and the court’s refusal to hold a Schwartz hearing. We affirm.

FACTS

Donald and Maxine Frank are semi-retired farmers. Their son, Kent Frank, 35, lives with his parents and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ponticas v. K.M.S. InvestmentsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  2. Zimmerman Ex Rel. Zimmerman v. Witte Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  3. Pluwak v. LindbergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
  4. Bianchi v. NordbySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
  5. Thorn v. Glass DepotCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Baker v. Amtrak National Railroad PassengerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999
  2. Senf v. BolluytCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
  3. Senf v. BolluytCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API