Legal Opinion

First National Bank v. Ford Motor Credit Co.

District Court, D. Colorado

Decided October 3, 1990No. Civ. A. 88-N-317PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

NOTTINGHAM, District Judge.

Plaintiff First National Bank in Alamo-sa’s (“the Bank’s”) lawsuit against Ford Motor Credit Company (“Ford”) is based on Ford’s refusal to honor nine sight drafts presented to Ford, as acceptor or drawee, and directing it to pay a total of $93,144.86. The drafts were drawn on Ford by Clark/Cravens Alamosa Motors, Inc. (the Bank’s customer and a car dealer associated with Ford Motor Company), and delivered to the Bank for collection through the commercial banking system. Alamosa Motors initiated the collection process by depositing the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Kiely v. St. GermainSupreme Court of Colorado · 1983
  3. Vigoda v. Denver Urban Renewal AuthoritySupreme Court of Colorado · 1982
  4. Galie v. RAM Associates Management Services, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1988
  5. Galaxy Boat Manufacturing Co. v. East End State BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1982

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Triffin v. DillaboughSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  2. Owen v. Kroger Co.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 1996
  3. First National Bank & Trust Co. of McAlester v. Chrysler Credit Corp.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1993
  4. Lewis v. Firstbank of ShinnstonDistrict Court, N.D. West Virginia · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API