Legal Opinion

First National Bank & Trust Co. of McAlester v. Chrysler Credit Corp.

Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided March 16, 1993No. Nos. 78702, 79352Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

HUNTER, Judge:

Appellant (Chrysler Credit) claims the trial court erred when it granted summary judgment in favor of Appellee (Bank) (78,702), and when it subsequently awarded attorney fees to Bank (79,352). We hold that retail finance drafts, even when the draft forms are crafted by drawee for the use of dealerships, do not contain an implied promise that drawee will pay. Draw-ee is not obligated to pay unless drawee accepts the draft. The recourse for payment is against drawer of the draft.

FACTS

Chrysler Credit and Fitter Jeep-Eagle (Dealership), entered a contract for…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Northrip v. Montgomery Ward & Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1974
  2. Loffland Bros. Co. v. OverstreetSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
  3. Hampton v. Surety Development Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991
  4. First National Bank v. Ford Motor Credit Co.District Court, D. Colorado · 1990
  5. Liberty National Bank & Trust Co. v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API