Legal Opinion

Triffin v. Dillabough

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 18, 1996No. 365PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WIEAND, Judge:

The issue in this appeal is whether blank money orders, which were stolen prior to being sold and subsequently com pleted without authorization, are negotiable instruments, and, if so, whether a holder in due course has a right to payment on the instruments despite a lack of initial consideration and the absence of delivery. Robert J. Triffin, the plaintiff/appellant herein, instituted an action to obtain payment on the stolen money orders after payment had been refused by defendant, American Express Travel Related Services Co., Inc. (American Express). Following a non-jury…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Manor Building Corp. v. Manor Complex Associates, Ltd.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  2. Fehr v. CampbellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  3. Plemens v. Diddeglaser, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1966
  4. Arcuri v. WeissSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  5. Norman v. World Wide Distributors, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1963

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. PHH Mortgage Corp. v. Powell, R.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  2. J.W.S. Delavau, Inc. v. Eastern America Transport & Warehousing, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  3. Triffin v. DillaboughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  4. Manfredi v. Dauphin Deposit BankSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  5. Buffalo Molded Plastics, Inc. v. Plastic Mold Technology, Inc. (In Re Buffalo Molded Plastics, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2006

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API