Legal Opinion

Borggaard v. Department of Public Works

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided October 15, 1937PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLummus, J.

G. L. (Ter. Ed.) c. 85, § 2, provides: “. . . Said department [hf public works], after a public hearing *418and with the approval of the governor and council, may from time to time make, alter, rescind or add to rules and regulations to direct, govern and restrict the movement of vehicles on all state highways and to carry out the purposes of section nine of chapter eighty-nine on highways, including state highways, which are designated thereunder by said department as through ways, with penalties for the violation thereof not exceeding twenty dollars for each offence; provided, that nothing in…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Crimmins & Peirce Co. v. Kidder Peabody Acceptance Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
  2. Morley v. Police CommissionerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1927
  3. Rubenstein v. LottowMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1915
  4. Hallett v. MooreMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
  5. Shuman v. GilbertMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Druzik v. Board of Health of HaverhillMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1949
  2. Assessors of Quincy v. Boston Consolidated Gas Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
  3. Slome v. Chief of Police of FitchburgMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
  4. Karcher v. BurbankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
  5. Bureau of Old Age Assistance v. Commissioner of Public WelfareMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1950

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API