Legal Opinion

Karcher v. Burbank

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided June 3, 1939PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCox, J.

The only question in this case is whether the final decree, from which the defendants appealed, should *304have been entered enjoining, as it did, the defendants from further prosecution of actions brought by them against The American Sugar Refining Company, hereinafter referred to as the company, and from instituting or pressing any action or claim against that company on account of injuries received by the defendants by reason of an automobile accident involving a motor vehicle in which they were riding and a motor vehicle owned and operated by the plaintiff. The case was heard by a judge of…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Wells Fargo & Co. v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  3. Bello v. ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Solomon v. DabrowskiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
  5. Pangburn v. . Buick Motor Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1914

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. United States v. AcordCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1954
  2. Pennsylvania Greyhound Lines, Inc. v. RosenthalSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1954
  3. Finney v. FARMERS INSURANCECourt of Appeals of Washington · 1978
  4. Boucher v. ThomsenMichigan Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Kelly v. DIMEO, INC. WATERPROOFING CO.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1991

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API