Legal Opinion
Druzik v. Board of Health of Haverhill
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided April 4, 1949PublishedCited by 95 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWilkins, J.
In this bill in equity the plaintiffs allege that they are owners and operators of manufacturing *132bakeries in the city of Haverhill, and seek that a regulation of the defendant board of health of that city be declared null and void. From a decree declaring that the regulation is “indefinite, arbitrary, unreasonable and void,” the defendant board appeals.
The regulation, effective January 1, 1948, and set forth in the bill and admitted in the answer, is as follows: “All breads, rolls, biscuits, muffins and any other bakery products, which, in the opinion of the board of health, require such…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Yick Wo v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Lanzetta v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Winters v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Pacific States Box & Basket Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by95 opinions
- Purity Supreme, Inc. v. Attorney GeneralMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
- Consolidated Cigar Corp. v. Department of Public HealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
- Bloom v. City of WorcesterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
- Borden, Inc. v. Commissioner of Public HealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
- Tri-Nel Management, Inc. v. Board of HealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2001
90 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.