Legal Opinion
Rubenstein v. Lottow
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided January 20, 1915PublishedCited by 44 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLoring, J.
The undisputed facts out of which these two suits in equity have arisen are in substance as follows.
In April, 1911, one Setlin, who theretofore had been a shipping clerk in the employ of an overall company on Hanover Street in Boston, set up in business for himself. To use his own words, the business consisted in "jobbing; children’s dresses and muslin underwear.” The defendant Lottow was an uncle of Setlin. His business was manufacturing “ladies’ and children’s dresses.” He assisted his nephew Setlin in setting up in business; he sold him goods on credit and spoke a good word for him when…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Coder v. ArtsSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Lumiansky v. TessierMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
- Harvey-Watts Co. v. Worcester Umbrella Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1906
- City of Boston v. SimmonsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1890
- Graves v. JohnsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Spiegel v. Beacon Participations, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
- Minot v. MinotMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
- Trade Mutual Liability Insurance v. PetersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
- King v. GraceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
- Vincent v. PleckerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.