Legal Opinion
Slome v. Chief of Police of Fitchburg
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided October 26, 1939PublishedCited by 53 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRonan, J.
The plaintiff owns and operates a filling station, in Fitchburg, for the sale of gasoline and motor oil for automobiles, and is a retail dealer in motor fuel within the provisions of St. 1938, c. 411, which amended G. L. (Ter. Ed.) c. 94, by inserting therein §§ 295B and 295C. See now St. 1939, c. 459, § 1. The bill alleges that the plaintiff, in the conduct of his business, maintains signs advertising prices of motor fuel that do not comply with the last mentioned section; that the defendant, the chief of police of Fitch-*188burg, intends to enforce the provisions of § 295C and that, if he does…
2Cases cited57 opinions
- Jacobson v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- United States v. Carolene Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- South Carolina State Highway Department v. Barnwell Bros.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Semler v. Oregon State Board of Dental ExaminersSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Clark v. Paul Gray, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- Gambone v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
- Druzik v. Board of Health of HaverhillMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1949
- Commonwealth v. Henry's Drywall Co., Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
- Sperry & Hutchinson Co. v. Director of the Division on the Necessaries of LifeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
- Lowell v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1948
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.