Legal Opinion

Katz v. Ohio Insurance Guaranty Ass'n

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 18, 2004No. 2003-0028PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoyer, C.J.

{¶ 1} Dr. Gordon Katz, appellee, is a licensed doctor of osteopathy. He was insured under medical professional liability policies issued by P.I.E. Mutual Insurance Company (“P.I.E.”) for the period July 1, 1993, through July 1, 1995. The primary policy provided liability coverage of up to $200,000 per claim with a $600,000 aggregate limit. P.I.E. had also issued an excess insurance policy to Katz that provided an additional $1 million per claim with an aggregate limit for all claims of $1 million.

{¶ 2} In 1995, Katz notified P.I.E. that claims arising out of the treatment of Teri Sue Robinson…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Savoie v. Grange Mutual InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Karabin v. State Automobile Mutual InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Burris v. Grange Mutual CompaniesOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Wood v. ShepardOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Lake Hospital System, Inc. v. Ohio Insurance Guaranty Ass'nOhio Supreme Court · 1994

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Witt v. Ohio Insurance Guaranty Ass'nOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Merchants Ins. Group v. Mitsubishi Motor Credit AssociationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2010
  3. Thomson v. OHIC InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Thomson v. OHIC InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Witt v. Ohio Insurance Guaranty Ass'nOhio Supreme Court · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API