Hamilton v. Travelers Indemnity Co.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
EAGLES, Judge.
Plaintiff claims only under the UM coverage; no other liability is asserted under the policy. The parties do not dispute the facts, only the interpretation of the policy and applicable statutory language. Since the case presents only questions of law, summary judgment was appropriate. Kessing v. National Mortgage Corp., 278 N.C. 523, 180 S.E. 2d 823 (1971). The decision of the trial court is fully reviewable here. North Carolina Reins. Facility v. North Carolina Ins. Guaranty Ass’n, 67 N.C. App. 359, 313 S.E. 2d 253 (1984).
Under the terms of its UM coverage, defendant obligated…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Kessing v. National Mortgage CorporationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- Wachovia Bank & Trust Co. v. Westchester Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
- Woods v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
- Pickering v. American Employers InsuranceSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1971
- Pike v. Wachovia Bank and Trust CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Sutton v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
- Hendrickson v. LeeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995
- Lanning v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
- Bailey v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
- Harris Ex Rel. Freedman v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.