Harris Ex Rel. Freedman v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
WELLS, Judge.
Defendant assigns error to the trial court granting plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment and denying defendant’s motion for summary judgment. Defendant contends that Michelle K. Harris is not entitled to stack the three vehicles on her parents’ single policy because she is not the owner of the insured vehicles.
The decision of our Supreme Court in Sutton v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co., 325 N.C. 259, 382 S.E.2d 759, reh’g denied, 325 N.C. 437, 384 S.E.2d 546 (1989), allows intrapolicy and interpolicy stacking of UIM coverage. In Sutton, the court held that the language of the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Woods v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
- Matter of BanksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
- Stevenson v. City of DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- Sutton v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
- Smith v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Harris v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
- Leonard v. North Carolina Farm Bureau Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
- Manning v. TrippCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
- Davis v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992
- Amos v. North Carolina Farm Bureau Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.