Lanning v. Allstate Insurance
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
EXUM, Chief Justice.
This is a declaratory judgment action brought to determine plaintiffs’ rights under an automobile insurance policy issued by defendant Allstate Insurance Company (Allstate). At issue is whether N.C.G.S. § 20-279.21 (1989) requires that the UM coverage limits on each of three vehicles insured in the policy be aggregated, or “stacked.” If it does not, the next question is whether the nature of the policy itself and the language it employs requires such stacking. We conclude, for the reasons given below, that the answers to both questions are no.
I
The parties have stipulated…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. FulcherSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
- Woods v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
- Sutton v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
- Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. ChantosSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
- Moore v. Hartford Fire Insurance Company GroupSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Register v. WhiteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2004
- Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. MabeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1996
- McLeod v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
- Harrington v. StevensSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1993
- Bailey v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.