Legal Opinion

State v. Holmon

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 6, 1978No. 7820SC41PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

BRITT, Judge.

By his first assignment of error, defendant contends that the trial court erred in failing to grant his motion to dismiss the charge contained in the bill of indictment on the grounds that the bill failed to state an offense. We find merit in this contention.

G.S. 15A-924(a) sets forth what a criminal pleading, including an indictment, must contain. The statute provides in pertinent part:

* * *(5) A plain and concise factual statement in each count which, without allegations of an evidentiary nature, asserts facts supporting every element of a criminal offense and the defendant’s…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State v. FulcherSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  2. State v. SparrowSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  3. State v. TaylorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  4. State v. RieraSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  5. State v. . MorganSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. RiceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API