Legal Opinion

Kridler v. Ford Motor Co.

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided March 2, 1970No. 18090PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

ADAMS, Circuit Judge.

This action for personal injuries is another case which tests the expanding liability of automobile manufacturers and distributors to purchasers in situations where the product is alleged to be defective and an accident thereafter occurs. The suit here is based on express and implied warranties made in connection with the sale of an automobile manufactured by defendant Ford Motor Company. It arises as a result of an accident which happened on August 24, 1963.

The ease was tried before the Honorable Gerald J. Weber and a jury in November, 1968. The jury…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Smith v. Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  2. Neville Chemical Company v. Union Carbide CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
  3. Kassab v. SoyaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  4. Edward C. Denneny and Catherine Denneny v. Bernard Siegel, Louis H. Block and the Albert Einstein Medical CenterCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1969
  5. MacDougall v. Ford Motor Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1969

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Mary Vizzini, Administratrix of the Estate of Salvatore Vizzini, Deceased v. Ford Motor Company C/o C. T. Corp. SystemCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
  2. Grady Paul Chestnut v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1971
  3. Thelma Greiner v. Volkswagenwerk Aktiengeselleschaft and Volkswagen of America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
  4. D'Antona v. Hampton Grinding Wheel Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  5. Rhoads v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API