D'Antona v. Hampton Grinding Wheel Co.

Opinion by

Hoffman, J.,

Appellant contends that the court below erred in sustaining appellee’s preliminary objections to his complaint because it failed to state a cause of action.

In the amended complaint, appellant alleged that he was employed as a castings grinder on January 30, 1970. In the course of his employment, his machine’s grinding wheel exploded into fragments striking and seriously injuring appellant’s arms and legs.

*122Appellant filed complaints against three defendants: Ms employer (LeMgh Industries) j1 the manufacturer of the grinding wheel (Hampton, Inc.) ; and the manufacturer of…