Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Kerber

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 6, 2000No. C94-1200CV; CA A99878PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKistler, J.

Relying on ORCP 17 C, the trial court sanctioned defendants and their attorney twice. On appeal, the attorney challenges both sanctions. We affirm.

Although this case has a lengthy history, it may be summarized relatively briefly. Plaintiff filed an action in 1994 to recover on defendants’ note and to foreclose a trust deed that defendants had given as security. Defendant Rodney Kerber responded to plaintiffs action by filing for bankruptcy four times. Each of his bankruptcy proceedings was dismissed, and the bankruptcy court imposed sanctions on him when it dismissed his last filing.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Mattiza v. FosterOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  2. State v. CookCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  3. Cantua v. CreagerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  4. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local No. 48 v. Oregon Steel Mills, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  5. Fernley v. LloydCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re LeuenbergerOregon Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Sinio v. BledsoeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  3. Sinio v. BledsoeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API