Legal Opinion
Cantua v. Creager
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided July 12, 2000No. 94-2024-L-1; CA A98930PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ARMSTRONG, J..
Plaintiffs formerly worked at Visual Changes Salon, which was owned by defendant. They stated claims against defendant based on his conduct toward them. The issues on appeal arise from the varying results of their claims. Plaintiffs King and Kime appeal awards of attorney fees that were entered against them pursuant to ORS 20.107 and ORS 659.121(1). King also appeals the grant of a directed verdict for defendant on King’s claims for intentional infliction of emotional distress, common-law wrongful discharge, sex discrimination under ORS 659.030(l)(b), and breach of contract.…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. VinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- BMW of North America, Inc. v. GoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Holien v. Sears, Roebuck and Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1984
- Best v. United States National BankOregon Supreme Court · 1987
- McCarthy v. Oregon Freeze Dry, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1998
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Arnett v. Bank of AmericaDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2012
- In Re Fedex Ground Package System, Inc., Employment Practices LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2009
- Duke v. F.M.K. Construction Services, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2010
- Siverly v. Young & Morgan Trucking Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
- Taylor v. KerberCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.