Fernley v. Lloyd
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, P. J.
Defendant appeals and plaintiff cross-appeals from a judgment dismissing plaintiffs complaint and a supplemental judgment denying attorney fees. ORS 19.205(2)(a). The trial court described this case as having “a long and tortured history, consistent with the long and tortured history of the relationship of the parties and their transactions.” There is no benefit to be gained by providing any further details of the facts of this case, except to say that plaintiff is the seller and defendant the buyer of real property in a disputed land sale contract. Defendant makes 12 assignments of error.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Mattiza v. FosterOregon Supreme Court · 1990
- Yates v. LargeOregon Supreme Court · 1978
- Niedermeyer v. LatimerOregon Supreme Court · 1989
- Polizos v. SkoroCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
- Care Medical Equipment, Inc. v. BaldwinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
3Cited by4 opinions
- AutoLend, IAP, Inc. v. Auto Depot, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
- Taylor v. KerberCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
- G. W. Paulson Co. v. GradyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
- Sinio v. BledsoeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001