Legal Opinion

Sinio v. Bledsoe

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 31, 2001No. P96-11-05; CA A100219PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtKistler, J.

The trial court imposed sanctions on appellant, an attorney, for filing an affidavit that was designed to make the court think that her client had little or no assets when her client in fact had $60,000 to $70,000 in assets. We affirm.

Bess Sinio is the beneficiary of a trust created by her mother’s will. Sinio’s son, Frank Bledsoe, is the trustee. Sinio concluded that her son had breached his fiduciary duties. Sinio’s first attorney filed an action in circuit court to recover the damages that Sinio had allegedly suffered as a result of her son’s actions. Sinio discharged her first attorney…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Thompson v. Bolliger, Hampton & TarlowCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  3. Fernley v. LloydCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  4. Taylor v. KerberCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. May Trucking Co. v. Northwest Volvo Trucks, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API