Nein v. HostPro, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SUZUKAWA, J.
INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff Randy Nein was employed by defendants HostPro, Inc., and Interland, Inc. (collectively, defendant), as a salesperson between October 1999 and December 2001. In December 2000, plaintiff approached AT&T Corporation (AT&T) and suggested that defendant provide Web-hosting services to some of AT&T’s business customers. Such a transaction was still being negotiated when defendant terminated plaintiff in December 2001, and it was consummated the following month.
Plaintiff seeks through the present action to recover commissions he claims are due him in…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Foley v. Interactive Data Corp.California Supreme Court · 1988
- Consumers Lobby Against Monopolies v. Public Utilities CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Panos v. Great Western Packing Co.California Supreme Court · 1943
- Sangster v. PaetkauCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Laabs v. City of VictorvilleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Nordstrom Commission CasesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Johnson v. Hewlett-Packard Co.District Court, N.D. California · 2011
- Dent Mart Internat. v. Eun Hee Dental etc. CA2/3California Court of Appeal · 2020
- King v. U.S. Bank National Assn.California Court of Appeal · 2020
- King v. U.S. Bank National Assn. CA3 Case DetailsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.