Legal Opinion

Nordstrom Commission Cases

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 10, 2010No. G042772PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

FYBEL, J.

Introduction

Ernest Young and Nicole S avala filed separate class action lawsuits against Nordstrom, Inc., alleging Nordstrom’s policy of paying net sales commissions to its commissioned sales employees violated sections 221 and 203 of the Labor Code. (All further statutory references are to the Labor Code, unless otherwise noted.) In 2009, the parties reached a settlement. One member of the class, Kellie Taylor, objected to the settlement. The trial court overruled Taylor’s objection, and approved the settlement. Taylor appealed, and we affirm.

The trial court considered all…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Amaral v. Cintas Corp. No. 2California Court of Appeal · 2008
  2. Branick v. Downey Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Wershba v. Apple Computer, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2001
  4. Franco v. Athens Disposal Co., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2009
  5. Dunk v. Ford Motor Co.California Court of Appeal · 1996

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Villacres v. Abm Industries Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2010
  2. Diaz v. Grill Concepts Servs., Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  3. Gruen v. GruenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  4. Cruz v. Sun World International, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  5. Turkanis v. PriceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API